A broadband Butler-based dual-polarized omni-directional antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a broadband Butler-based slant ±45° dual-polarized omni-directional antenna working at the frequency band of 1.69–2.69 GHz for extending wireless communication network capacity in the limited service size. The proposed antenna realizes a 360° full coverage with wider bandwidth in a compact cylinder and increases the network capacity to 6 × 6 MIMO instead of using three traditional 2 × 2 MIMO omni-directional antennas. Theoretical analysis, simulation, and fabrication are conducted to validate the idea of the proposed omni-directional antenna. The measured results show 46% bandwidth with 15 dB return loss, 2.2 dB azimuth null and 8.9–10.5 dBi gain for port-C with 0° phase increment, and 14.1 dB azimuth null and 9.6–10.6 dBi gain for port-L/R (left/right) with ±120° phase increment, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".