MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362632969 · doi:10.31294/jp.v21i1.15406

Persepsi Mahasiswa Mengenai Manajemen Keuangan Pribadi Dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Resesi Ekonomi Di Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4362632969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Perspektif · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionRevenueNonprobability samplingPopulationSample (material)BusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)FinanceEconomic growthAccountingEconomicsGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered the threat economic recession in Indonesia. This condition was strengthened by the increasing number unemployed and soaring prices basic goods and fuel oil. Economic growth in Indonesia is expected to show positive numbers periodically every quarter. However, people still have to be vigilant and prepare to face the threat economic recession. Including one of them, namely students in managing finances wisely and efficiently. The purpose of this research was to determine student perceptions of personal financial management in facing the threat economic recession in Indonesia. This research method is descriptive qualitative which focuses on three indicators, namely budget preparation, emergency fund preparation, and savings measures. The population in this study were students Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Budi Luhur with sample 265 respondents who were taken using a purposive sampling technique. Analysis the data used in this study to measure student perceptions using score interpretation categories. The results of the study show that the budget preparation indicator is in the low category. The emergency fund preparation indicator is in the medium category. And for the indicator for saving action, it is in the low category. So that there is a low perception of students in preparing a budget, and they understand enough about the importance of emergency funds, but have not been able to take savings measures in the face threat of an economic recession in Indonesia. Suggestion the students as millennial generation can improve their financial literacy by getting used to making budgets and routines saving to achieve personal financial well-being. Keywords: Perception Student, Personal Financial Management, Recession Threat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it