MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362633592 · doi:10.1177/09564624231167910

Predictors of mobility among women engaged in commercial sex work in Uganda using generalized estimating equations model

2023· article· en· W4362633592 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua Kiyingi, Susan S. Witte, Proscovia Nabunya, Edward Nsubuga, Ozge Sensoy Bahar, Larissa Jennings Mayo‐Wilson, Samuel Kizito, Jennifer Nattabi, Josephine Nabayinda, Fred M. Ssewamala

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of STD & AIDS · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Mental HealthYork UniversityWashington University in St. Louis
KeywordsGeneralized estimating equationResidenceMedicineOddsDemographyGeeOdds ratioSex workLongitudinal studyBaseline (sea)Confidence intervalGerontologySocial mobilityEstimating equationsRural areaMen who have sex with menHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Logistic regressionInternal medicineImmunologySyphilisMaximum likelihoodStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Women engaged in commercial sex work (WESW) are at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV. WESW are highly mobile, and their mobility may increase their economic status, and increased access to healthcare and other social services. However, it may also facilitate the spread of HIV infection from higher to lower prevalence regions. This study examined the predictors of mobility among WESW in Uganda using a generalized estimating equations model. METHODS: We defined and measured mobility as the change in residence by WESW between baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up. Participants who changed places were considered mobile, and those who never changed were non-mobile. We used data from a longitudinal study, which recruited 542 WESW from Southern Uganda aged 18-55 years and constructed a Generalized Estimating Equations Model. RESULTS: Findings show that 19.6% of WESW changed residence between baseline and 6 months of follow-up and 26.2% (cumulative) between baseline and 12 months of follow-up. Older women (OR = 0.966, 95% CI = 0.935, 0.997) were associated with decreased odds of mobility, whereas WESW who were HIV positive (OR = 1.475, 95% CI = 1.078, 2.018) and those from large households (OR = 1.066, 95% CI = 1.001, 1.134) were associated with increased odds of mobility. WESW residing in rural areas (OR = 0.535, 95% CI = 0.351, 0.817) were associated with decreased odds of mobility compared to those from fishing sites. CONCLUSION: The results indicate risk factors for mobility, further research is needed to determine the directionality of these factors in order to design interventions addressing mobility among WESW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of STD & AIDSSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207