Sexual Satisfaction of Midlife Women Living With HIV in Canada: A Prospective Cohort Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although sexual activity and function decline in older women living with HIV, positive dimensions of sexual health, such as satisfaction, are relatively unexplored. We evaluated the prevalence of sexual satisfaction for midlife women with HIV and assessed its relation to women's physical, mental, and sociostructural experiences. SETTING: We studied women in the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS) over 3 survey waves (2013-2018). METHODS: We included women living with HIV aged ≥45 years who reported ever having consensual sex. Sexual satisfaction was assessed using an item from the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women and was dichotomized into satisfactory ("completely/very/reasonably satisfactory") and not satisfactory ("not very/not at all satisfactory"). Probable depression was based on CES-D ≥10. Multivariable logistic regression and fixed effects models determined correlates of sexual satisfaction. Reasons for sexual inactivity and alternate forms of sexual expression were also explored. RESULTS: Among 508 midlife women, 61% were satisfied with their sexual lives at baseline. Women with probable depression had lower odds of sexual satisfaction than those without (aOR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.71) and worsening depressive symptoms over time were associated with poorer sexual satisfaction ( P = 0.001). Increased sexual activity was associated with higher sexual satisfaction (aOR: 2.75; 95% CI: 1.54 to 4.91); however, 51% of women reporting sexual satisfaction were sexually inactive. Sexually inactive women engaged in alternate forms of sexual expression such as self-pleasure (37%) and intimate relationships without sex (13%). CONCLUSION: Midlife women with HIV have high rates of sexual satisfaction, even in the absence of sexual activity. Depressive symptoms were closely associated with sexual dissatisfaction, alerting providers to the importance of screening for depression and sexual health together.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".