MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Online Inductance Estimation of PM-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor Using Artificial Neural Network

2023· article· en· W4362647316 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmadreza Karami-Shahnani, Hossein Dehghan-Niri, Reza Nasiri‐Zarandi, Karim Abbaszadeh, Mohammad Sedigh Toulabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Synchronous motorMagnetic reluctanceArtificial neural networkInductanceTorqueComputer scienceRotor (electric)Finite element methodControl engineeringSwitched reluctance motorMachine controlNonlinear systemMagnetEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysicsMechanical engineeringVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Permanent Magnet-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor (PMASynRM) is favored because of its lower Permanent Magnet (PM) amount. They utilize more reluctance than PM torque compared to Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (IPMSM) and Surface Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (SPMSM). Understanding the motor parameters at each operating point is crucial to achieving maximum efficiency. Variation of motor parameters due to temperature using offline models has been reported in the literature. These methods are computationally intensive, especially when the effect of cross-saturation is included in the models. Online parameter estimation is more impressive in real applications to develop a high-performance control technique as a result of these limitations, particularly when motors confront highly nonlinear structures such as PMASynRMs. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is presented in this paper for online estimation of inductances at the Rotor Reference Frame (RRF) to ensure optimum performance for model-based control systems. An online-tuned dynamic model is implemented by the proposed ANN and compared with Finite Element Analysis (FEA) data and experimental validation tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207