MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The 5G Wireless Technology and a Significant Economic Growth and Sustainable Development

2023· article· en· W4362647498 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulsalam Alkholidi, Naif Alsharabi, Habib Hamam, Talal Alshammari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile phoneEntertainmentBusinessPillarMobile technologyMarketingComputer scienceTelecommunicationsMobile computingEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5G technology can create millions of new jobs in many economic and industry sectors. It needs an in-depth study between the engineering sector, business, moneymen, and economists to introduce new ideas and develop a road map to benefit from this technology. Also, learn from the experiences of pioneers in this sector. Mobile phone networks are no longer a means of social media, entertainment, narrow commerce, and commercial correspondence. They have become a new pillar in economic growth if they are optimally exploited. This paper aims at highlighting 5G mobile networks and economic growth by studying and analyzing prestigious research and technical and commercial related reports and raising important recommendations to the decision-makers to take advantage of it and adapt this modern technology to develop the economic sector and create new opportunities for young people and those interested. The most important recommendation of this study is the need to support a new generation of young people, especially in the least developed countries in the formation of their minor economic projects, taking advantage of the huge potential of 5G technology, as well as the localization of this technique in many medium and giant projects. One of the key recommendations of this study is to encourage young people to involve in this promising field and help them set up small businesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207