SecBerg: Secure and Practical Iceberg Queries in Cloud
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Secure queries are fundamental to data security, particularly in cloud databases. In data analytics, one of the common and practical queries is the iceberg query that can find aggregate values above a specified threshold. However, existing secure aggregate query schemes: 1) are unable to support secure iceberg queries equipped with the HAVING clause; 2) only consider additive aggregate functions; and 3) suffer from performance issues due to the use of homomorphic encryption to encrypt databases. In this article, we present a secure iceberg query scheme, SecBerg, to support both addition-based and comparison-based aggregate functions and ensure high efficiency and security simultaneously. To make it possible, we propose a secure bitmap index system to encode database values and pioneer the use of the arithmetic secret sharing technique to protect databases in the cloud environment. Furthermore, we carefully design efficient and secure protocols over arithmetic secret sharing to construct our SecBerg. Extensive evaluations are conducted, and the results indicate that SecBerg is significantly more efficient than the state-of-the-art relevant scheme in computational overhead and can attain orders of magnitude performance improvement at best.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it