MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362654030 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3264618

Average Age-of-Information Minimization in Aerial IRS-Assisted Data Delivery

2023· article· en· W4362654030 on OpenAlexafffund
Wenwen Jiang, Bo Ai, Mushu Li, Wen Wu, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesRoyal SocietyShenzhen Research Institute of Big DataNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceUploadBenchmark (surveying)Coordinate descentBase stationReal-time computingRelayMinificationOptimization problemWirelessChannel (broadcasting)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmComputer networkPower (physics)TelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aerial intelligent reconfigurable surface (IRS) is a promising technology to enhance channel quality in data delivery. In this article, we study an aerial IRS deployment problem to enable timely and reliable data delivery in a remote Internet of Things (IoT) scenario, in which an IRS mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is adopted as a mobile relay to assist devices in uploading data to the base station (BS). The objective is to minimize the average Age of Information (AoI) of the data received by the BS over time by jointly determining the aerial IRS deployment position and phase shift, transmit power of devices, and data uploading time. Under the requirements of peak AoI (PAoI) and communication reliability, we formulate an average AoI minimization problem. Since the nonlinear relations among optimization variables make the formulated problem nonconvex and intractable to solve, we propose a block coordinate descent (BCD)-based iterative algorithm which decomposes the formulated problem into several subproblems. The variables are optimized in each subproblem individually in an alternately iterative manner to attain a near-optimal solution. Simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm in improving the information freshness compared with the benchmark schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207