MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362654447 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2023.3264937

Stability Analysis for Model-Based Event-Triggered Nonlinear Control Systems Under DoS Attacks

2023· article· en· W4362654447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemComputer scienceController (irrigation)Denial-of-service attackStability (learning theory)DiscretizationLyapunov functionExponential stabilityMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we study the stability of a novel nonlinear event-triggered control system under denial-of-service (DoS) attacks based on an input-to-state stable Lyapunov function analysis. A new dual-mode model-based event-triggering strategy is proposed which works based on consistency between the approximate and exact discretization of the nonlinear plant. We combine an event-triggered module with a controller based on the state prediction, together with a packetized transmission at the controller-to-actuator channel to provide the desired stability properties under DoS attacks. We also provide proof of Zeno-free behavior for the event-based system. Our proposed method provides a maximum percentage of time that the system can tolerate attacks without performance degradation. Finally, a numerical example is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it