Modified central shunt in pulmonary atresia with diminutive pulmonary arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The commonly used central shunt (i.e. direct connection of the divided main pulmonary artery to the ascending aorta) to facilitate the growth of the diminutive branch pulmonary artery in patients with pulmonary atresia with major aortopulmonary collateral arteries can cause main pulmonary artery distortion, and subsequent disproportional branch pulmonary artery flow and growth. This report describes a novel technique of shunt construction to minimize pulmonary artery torque and tension by using a modified central shunt constructed from autologous pericardium that is anastomosed in an end-to-side fashion to the lateral aspect of the ascending aorta. This shunt will serve as an intermediary conduit to facilitate the main pulmonary artery anastomosis while minimizing torque and tension on the main pulmonary artery. The tension-free connection between the main pulmonary artery and the aorta enabled by the modified central shunt supports proportional pulmonary artery flow and growth in patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, or multiple aortopulmonary collateral arteries and concomitant diminutive native pulmonary arteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".