Neutral Drift and Threshold Selection Promote Phenotypic Variation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phenotypic variations within a population exist on different scales of biological organization and play a central role in evolution by providing adaptive capacity at the population-level. Thus, the question of how evolution generates phenotypic variation within an evolving population is fundamental in evolutionary biology. Here we address this question by performing experimental evolution of an antibiotic resistance gene, VIM-2 β-lactamase, combined with diverse biochemical assays and population genetics. We found that neutral drift, i.e. , evolution under a static environment, with a low antibiotic concentration can promote and maintain significant phenotypic variation within the population with >100-fold differences in resistance strength. We developed a model based on the phenotype-environment-fitness landscape generated with >5,000 VIM-2 variants, and demonstrated that the combination of “mutation-selection balance” and “threshold-like fitness-phenotype relationship” is sufficient to explain the generation of large phenotypic variation within the evolving population. Importantly, high-resistance conferring variants can emerge during neutral drift, without being a product of adaptation. Our findings provide a novel and simple mechanistic explanation for why most genes in nature, and by extension, systems and organisms, inherently exhibit phenotypic variation, and thus, population-level evolvability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".