MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362670016 · doi:10.54097/hset.v39i.6643

The Research of Different Algorithms on Path Planning

2023· article· en· W4362670016 on OpenAlexaff
Jianing Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion planningComputer scienceAlgorithmIdeal (ethics)Path (computing)BionicsBasis (linear algebra)Any-angle path planningTransportation planningOperations researchManagement scienceArtificial intelligenceTransport engineeringEngineeringMathematicsRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of modern existence is inextricably linked to path planning. Road transportation, urban road planning, and travel plans for people's travel requirements must all be carried out and assured on the basis of effective route planning implementation. However, the path planning algorithms are not ideal. This work brings together three contemporary popular algorithms: classical algorithms, graphics algorithms, and bionics algorithms. The article presents and evaluates their functions, as well as summarizes the benefits and drawbacks of each method. Following that, the experimental data from each algorithm is gathered and compared. The performance difference between different types of methods is analyzed. The collected results are integrated with the prior analysis to form a summary. Finally, the paper summarizes and looks forward to the full text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Science Engineering and TechnologySame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207