MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362670270 · doi:10.54097/hbem.v5i.5094

Predict Changes in Crude Oil Price and New Energy Automobile Industry Impacted by the Russian-Ukraine War

2023· article· en· W4362670270 on OpenAlexaff
Shangrui Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Business Economics and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrude oilEconomic shortagePetroleum industryShort runEconomicsOil pricePetroleumCrack spreadEconomyAgricultural economicsBusinessMonetary economicsEngineeringGovernment (linguistics)Petroleum engineeringEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Russian-Ukraine War is a hot topic nowadays as it causes a sharp rise in the world crude oil price, due to fears of supply shortages mount, which affects the cost of production for many industries. Meanwhile, the fear of running out of crude oil pushes the world to find new energy as a substitute. The car industry is an outstanding example that is experiencing transit from oil cars to new energy cars. Hence, there exist close relationships between the crude oil price and the new energy car industry. The article will discuss the short-run and long-run impact of the Russian-Ukraine War on crude oil prices and the Chinese new energy car industry using the VAR and ARMA-GARCH model. The models show that the effect of rising crude oil prices on the Chinese new energy automobile industry depends on whether the positive effect of sales growth is greater than the negative effect of the increase in cost in the short run, plus there’s no significant impact for the long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHighlights in Business Economics and Management→Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→