MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362675401 · doi:10.1145/3585341.3587954

Parallel Algorithm for a Hidden Markov Model with an Indefinite Number of States and Heterogeneous Observation Data

2023· article· en· W4362675401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Workshop on OpenCL · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelComputer scienceCode (set theory)Set (abstract data type)AlgorithmState (computer science)Markov modelParallel computingMarkov chainTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to being a modern technique used in speech recognition applications, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are widely used in other areas to predict equipment life cycles and optimize maintenance, for example. Problems of this type have a very limited and fragmented set of observable data, as well as limited information on the possible states of the system. This article proposes a strategy for organizing HMM parallel learning, which is effectively implemented using OpenCL on GPU devices. The originality of this approach lies in the parallel implementation of the learning algorithm for a model with an indefinite number of states and heterogeneous observed data: sometimes only the observed signal is available, and sometimes the state of the system is known. The code presented in this article are parallelized on several GPU devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it