MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362682885 · doi:10.1109/icapc57304.2022.00094

Fast Charging Technology for Electric Vehicles

2022· article· en· W4362682885 on OpenAlexaff
Chikai Cao, Kunyang Chen, Ji Wang, Yifan Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryNew energyChinaGovernment (linguistics)Green vehicleAutomotive engineeringMiles per gallon gasoline equivalentFossil fuelElectric vehicleBusinessAutomotive engineEngineeringPower (physics)Fuel efficiencyMechanical engineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of the new energy era, the innovation of the automobile industry can be said to be earth-shaking. More and more fossil energy is being replaced by clean energy. At present, the fastest developing new energy vehicles in the market are mainly electric vehicles. The biggest advantage of such vehicles is low maintenance cost in addition to environmental protection. In China, the government is actively introducing electric vehicles and has also launched many policies to stimulate sales of new energy vehicles in 2019. In March 2022, China's BYD company announced that it would stop the production of fuel cars, becoming the first traditional auto company in the world. German automaker Audi also announced that it will not develop or launch a fuel car in 2026. Fast charging is at the heart of the power supply for electric vehicles. This paper introduces the chemical concerns and electrical design for the fast charging technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research→French-language works237,207→