Être inuk et plurilingue à Kuujjuaq au Nunavik (grand Nord québécois) pour marcher ensemble les langues
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche qualitative inspirée par une approche ethno-sociolinguistique (Blanchet & Chardenet, 2011) et participative (Wang, 1999) permet de discuter les représentations sociolinguistiques de locuteurs Inuit plurilingues. Il s’agit, en effet, de comprendre comment les langues se transmettent au travers de l’engagement actif des familles dans des expériences altéritaires engageant des mises en narrations mobiles d’identités plurielles où le français, l’anglais et d’autres langues se (mé)tissent à l’inuktitut. Le corpus pluriel, tiré d’une thèse doctorale, inclut des entretiens, de la documentation visuelle par ethno-photographie d’événements communautaires, des prises de notes et des observations dans une communauté du Nunavik. La contribution interroge, aussi, sur fond de (re)vitalisation et de réconciliation (MacDonald & Moore, 2016 ; Patrick, 2015), la posture de chercheur en milieu autochtone (Moore & MacDonald, 2011) dans la recherche sociolinguistique et didactique sur le plurilinguisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it