Analisis Tingkat Kerentanan Terhadap Potensi Bahaya Kebakaran di Permukiman Padat Penduduk di Kelurahan Pelita Kecamatan Samarinda Ilir Kota Samarinda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang nilai tingkat kerentanan terhadap potensi bahaya kebakaran di kelurahan Pelita. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode skoring untuk mengidentifikasi nilai tingkat kerentanan terhadap potensi kebakaran berdasarkan variabel potensi kebakaran yang terdiri atas kepadatan bangunan rumah mukim, pola bangunan rumah mukim, jenis atap bangunan rumah mukim, lokasi sumber air, lebar jalan masuk, kepadatan lalu lintas kelistrikan, keterjangkaun hidran, ketersediaan tendon air, usia bangunan dan dinding bangunan. Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan GPS Area Measurement dan survey, wilayah yang menjadi sampel penelitian yaitu di jalan Lambung Mangkurat Gg Masjid akan dibagi menjadi 4 blok permukiman (blok I, II, III, IV) dengan menggunakan metode grid. Dari hasil analisis diketahui keempat blok masuk dalam kategori tinggi dengan skor masing-masing 26, 26, 29 dan 27.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".