MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362689916 · doi:10.55365/1923.x2023.21.44

Social and Psychological Problems and Their Relationship with Several Variables among University Students

2023· article· en· W4362689916 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Majid Khalaf Alshammari, Mohamad Hashim Othman, Yasmin Othman Mydin, Badiea Abdulkarem Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Economics and Finance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyFace (sociological concept)AnxietySocial issuesDepression (economics)Social psychologyApplied psychologyMedical educationSociologySocial sciencePolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper focuses on unearthing psychological and social issues among students, particularly those that arise during academic learning and pursuing educational goals.Generally, depression, stress, pressure, and anxiety are students' main psychological issues (Dobson, 2012).Students who face setbacks in their academic performance, learning difficulties, a lack of educational resources, unfavorable family environments, and other factors are the leading causes of psychological and social issues among students.When students encounter these issues, they must get assistance regarding possible remedies.Moreover, they must implement the policies and initiatives correctly after receiving the guidance.This research paper has considered the following key points: major psychological problems among university students, social issues among university students, ways for university students to deal with psychological issues, and addressing social issues among university students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Economics and FinanceSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207