MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362694044 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.22434436

A Primary-side Maximum Efficiency Transfer Solution in Wireless Power Transfer Systems: Theory and Validation

2023· preprint· en· W4362694044 on OpenAlexaff
A. Celentano, Carmine Paolino, Fabio Pareschi, Virgilio Valente, Riccardo Rovatti, Wouter A. Serdijn, Gianluca Setti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless power transferPower (physics)Power controlRegulatorMaximum power transfer theoremWirelessComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Transfer (computing)Point (geometry)Electronic engineeringControl (management)EngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsMathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the primary-side control of a Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) link, i.e., the capability of delivering the optimal power level to the load without compromising system efficiency, by only sensing quantities available at the primary side. When adding a simple power regulator at the secondary side, we observe and analyze the existence of a Maximum Efficiency Transfer point, easily detectable at the primary side, and corresponding to the additional power regulator being barely on, with negligible dissipated power. More important, the approach does not require any advanced system modeling, nor the estimation of the system parameters. A theoretical model is developed and verified by measurements on a prototype built upon a 60 mW-class-E based WPT link working at 6.78 MHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207