MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362694226 · doi:10.1117/12.2653907

An experimentally validated simulation model of a two-bin flat-panel cadmium telluride photon-counting detector for spectroscopic breast imaging applications

2023· article· en· W4362694226 on OpenAlexaff
James Day, Jesse Tanguay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodPhysicsDetectorCadmium telluride photovoltaicsPhotonDetective quantum efficiencyOpticsNoise (video)Charge sharingPhoton countingComputational physicsOptoelectronicsImage qualityComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flat-panel, cadmium telluride (CdTe) photon counting detectors (PCDs) are of interest for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Modelling of the frequency-dependent imaging performance of CdTe PCDs is useful for optimization of technique parameters. The purpose of this work is to experimentally validate a Monte-Carlo-based model of the frequency-dependent imaging performance of a CdTe PCD for contrast-enhanced breast imaging. Our Monte-Carlo model accounts for the basic physics of x-ray detection by PCDs, including the finite range of photo-electrons, characteristic emission and subsequent reabsorption, the finite size of charge clouds due to diffusion and Coulomb repulsion, electronic noise and energy thresholding. We validated the model using a two-bin CdTe PCD with charge summation for charge-sharing correction. The detector consists of a 750-um-thick CdTe converter with 100 um pixels. Our model was used to predict both the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) of both energy bins, in addition to the cross NPS between energy bins. Validation was performed for 40 kVp, 45 kVp and 50 kVp tube voltages. For each tube voltage, we validated for energy thresholds that resulted in photon ratios between the two energy bins of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1. In all cases, our model predicted the MTF of both energy bins within 3%. The modelled NNPS was 5% to 15% of the measured NNPS. We conclude that the Monte-Carlo-based model can be used to model the frequency-dependent signal and noise properties of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography implemented with CdTe PCDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207