MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362697698 · doi:10.1080/07350015.2023.2200458

A Dynamic Binary Probit Model with Time-Varying Parameters and Shrinkage Prior

2023· article· en· W4362697698 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongfang He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business and Economic Statistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsRoyal Bank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbit modelMarkov chain Monte CarloPrior probabilityLatent variableEconometricsKalman filterBayesian probabilityMonte Carlo methodBayes estimatorMathematicsProbitComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies a time series binary probit model in which the underlying latent variable depends on its lag and exogenous regressors. The regression coefficients for the latent variable are allowed to vary over time to capture possible model instability. Bayesian shrinkage priors are applied to automatically differentiate fixed and truly time-varying coefficients and thus avoid unnecessary model complexity. I develop an MCMC algorithm for model estimation that exploits parameter blocking to boost sampling efficiency. An efficient Monte Carlo approximation based on the Kalman filter is developed to improve the numerical stability for computing the predictive likelihood of the binary outcome. Benefits of the proposed model are illustrated in a simulation study and an application to forecast economic recessions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business and Economic StatisticsSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207