Coding Sequence Insertions in Fungal Genomes are Intrinsically Disordered and can Impart Functionally-Important Properties on the Host Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Insertion and deletion mutations (indels) are important mechanisms of generating protein diversity. Indels in coding sequences are under considerable selective pressure to maintain reading frames and to preserve protein function, but once generated, indels provide raw material for the acquisition of new protein properties and functions. We reported recently that coding sequence insertions in the Candida albicans NDU1 protein, a mitochondrial protein involved in the assembly of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase are imperative for respiration, biofilm formation and pathogenesis. NDU1 inserts are specific to CTG-clade fungi, absent in human ortholog and successfully harnessed as drug targets. Here, we present the first comprehensive report investigating indels and clade-defining insertions (CDIs) in fungal proteomes. We investigated 80 ascomycete proteomes encompassing CTG clade species, the Saccharomycetaceae family, the Aspergillaceae family and the Herpotrichiellaceae (black yeasts) family. We identified over 30,000 insertions, 4,000 CDIs and 2,500 clade-defining deletions (CDDs). Insert sizes range from 1 to over 1,000 residues in length, while maximum deletion length is 19 residues. Inserts are strikingly over-represented in protein kinases, and excluded from structural domains and transmembrane segments. Inserts are predicted to be highly disordered. The amino acid compositions of the inserts are highly depleted in hydrophobic residues and enriched in polar residues. An indel in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sth1 protein, the catalytic subunit of the RSC (Remodel the Structure of Chromatin) complex is predicted to be disordered until it forms a ß-strand upon interaction. This interaction performs a vital role in RSC-mediated transcriptional regulation, thereby expanding protein function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".