MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362704971 · doi:10.4271/2023-01-0293

Active Plasma Probing for Lean Burn Flame Detection

2023· article· en· W4362704971 on OpenAlexaff
Linyan Wang, Xiao Yu, Binghao Cong, Liguang Li, Guangyun Chen, Ming Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionMaterials sciencePlasmaVoltageFlame speedCombustorNuclear engineeringDiffusion flameAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Combustion diagnostics of highly diluted mixtures are essential for the estimation of the combustion quality, and control of combustion timing in advanced combustion systems. In this paper, a novel fast response flame detection technique based on active plasma is introduced and investigated. Different from the conventional ion current sensing used in internal combustion engines, a separate electrode gap is used in the detecting probing. Further, the detecting voltage across the electrode gap is modulated actively using a multi-coil system to be slightly below the breakdown threshold before flame arrival. Once the flame front arrives at the probe, the ions on the flame front tend to decrease the breakdown voltage threshold and trigger a breakdown event. Simultaneous electrical and optical measurements are employed to investigate the flame detecting efficacy via active plasma probing under both quiescent and flow conditions. The RT-FPGA system provides flexible, prompt, and precise control for the detecting frequency to analyze the overall flame propagation process. Two types of fuels are used in the study, including methane, and DME, with an air-fuel ratio sweep from stoichiometric to extremely lean. Efforts are made to characterize the criteria of minimum, yet adequate voltage to succeed in the detection of the flame front arrival. For comparison, conventional ion current measurements are conducted under identical testing conditions. Results show that the active plasma probing has benefits in detecting the flame arrival robustly for lean combustion under both quiescent and turbulent flow conditions. Under lean combustion, the intensity of ion current signal is significantly suppressed and signal rise time is prolonged due to the lower flame temperature. The active plasma probing provides a detecting response approximately one hundred times faster compared with the conventional ion current sensing, which shows potential for more effective real-time combustion control.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207