Quantification of carpal tunnel morphology using centroid-to-boundary distance shape signatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphology analysis is valuable to understanding risk factors and the etiology of carpal tunnel (CT) syndrome. The objective of this study was to investigate morphology changes along the length of the CT using shape signatures (SS). Analysis was performed on ten cadaveric specimens in neutral wrist posture. Centroid-to-boundary distance SS were generated for proximal, middle, and distal CT cross-sections. Phase shift and Euclidean distance were quantified relative to a template SS for each specimen. Medial, lateral, palmar, and dorsal peaks were identified on each SS to generate metrics of tunnel width, tunnel depth, peak amplitude, peak angle. Width and depth measures were also performed using previously reported methods to serve as a basis of comparison. The phase shift revealed twisting of 21° between the ends of the tunnel. Distance from the template and width varied significantly over the length of the tunnel, while depth did not. Measures of width and depth using the SS method were consistent with previously reported methods. The SS method afforded the advantage of peak analysis with overall trends of peak amplitude indicating flattening of the tunnel at the proximal and distal ends relative to a rounder shape in the middle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".