A Neuro-Informatics Pipeline for Cerebrovascular Disease: Research Registry Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although stroke is well recognized as a critical disease, treatment options are often limited. Inpatient stroke encounters carry critical information regarding the mechanisms of stroke and patient outcomes; however, these data are typically formatted to support administrative functions instead of research. To support improvements in the care of patients with stroke, a substantive research data platform is needed. OBJECTIVE: To advance a stroke-oriented learning health care system, we sought to establish a comprehensive research repository of stroke data using the Houston Methodist electronic health record (EHR) system. METHODS: Dedicated processes were developed to import EHR data of patients with primary acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), transient ischemic attack, and subarachnoid hemorrhage under a review board-approved protocol. Relevant patients were identified from discharge diagnosis codes and assigned registry patient identification numbers. For identified patients, extract, transform, and load processes imported EHR data of primary cerebrovascular disease admissions and available data from any previous or subsequent admissions. Data were loaded into patient-focused SQL objects to enable cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Primary data domains (admission details, comorbidities, laboratory data, medications, imaging data, and discharge characteristics) were loaded into separate relational tables unified by patient and encounter identification numbers. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and angiography images were retrieved. Imaging data from patients with ICH were assessed for hemorrhage characteristics and cerebral small vessel disease markers. Patient information needed to interface with other local and national databases was retained. Prospective patient outreach was established, with patients contacted via telephone to assess functional outcomes 30, 90, 180, and 365 days after discharge. Dashboards were constructed to provide investigators with data summaries to support access. RESULTS: The Registry of Neurological Endpoint Assessments among Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke (REINAH) database was constructed as a series of relational category-specific SQL objects. Encounter summaries and dashboards were constructed to draw from these objects, providing visual data summaries for investigators seeking to build studies based on REINAH data. As of June 2022, the database contains 18,061 total patients, including 1809 (10.02%) with ICH, 13,444 (74.43%) with acute ischemic stroke, 1221 (6.76%) with subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 3165 (17.52%) with transient ischemic attack. Depending on the cohort, imaging data from computed tomography are available for 85.83% (1048/1221) to 98.4% (1780/1809) of patients, with magnetic resonance imaging available for 27.85% (340/1221) to 85.54% (11,500/13,444) of patients. Outcome assessment has successfully contacted 56.1% (240/428) of patients after ICH, with 71.3% (171/240) of responders providing consent for assessment. Responders reported a median modified Rankin Scale score of 3 at 90 days after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A highly curated and clinically focused research platform for stroke data will establish a foundation for future research that may fundamentally improve poststroke patient care and outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.076 | 0.094 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".