Worsening frailty in community-dwelling older people with hypertension and associated factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with the worsening of frailty in older people with arterial hypertension. Methods Quantitative, longitudinal, prospective and analytical study. Carried out in community-dwelling hypertensive older people from Minas Gerais. Sampling was probabilistic, by clusters in two stages. Data collection took place at the older people's homes in two moments. Demographic, socioeconomic and clinical-assistance variables were analyzed. Frailty was measured by the Edmonton Frailty Scale. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to obtain crude and adjusted prevalence ratios. Results 281 older people participated in the study, 23.1% showed a worsening of their state of frailty. The prevalence of frailty increased from 38.0% in the base year to 31.2% in the first wave. The worsening of frailty was associated with negative self-perception of health, polypharmacy and hospitalization in the last 12 months. Conclusion There was a transition between states of frailty. An important contingent of the older people showed worsening frailty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".