MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362720014 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2023.0050

The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective ed. by David Lummus

2023· article· en· W4362720014 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Di Dodo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)ParallelsRhetorical questionStorytellingHistoryLiteratureArtNarrativeVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective ed. by David Lummus Emily Di Dodo The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective. Ed. by David Lummus. (Lectura Boccaccii, 6) Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2021. xii+290 pp. $75. ISBN 978–1–4875–0871–5. The Sixth Day of the Decameron, over which Elissa reigns, is widely regarded as a tour de force of rhetorical concision, the theme being 'those who, on being provoked by some verbal pleasantry, have returned like for like, or who, by a prompt retort or shrewd manœuvre, have avoided danger, discomfiture or ridicule' (Giovanni Boccaccio, The Decameron, trans. by G. H. McWilliam (New York: Penguin, 2003), p. 444). This volume offers a fresh perspective on and rich insights into these tales, engaging with past criticism, especially concerning the metaliterary nature of the tales, but then builds upon it with novel readings, which in some cases unabashedly move against the grain of traditional scholarship. The book will become a point of reference especially for students, both undergraduate and graduate. All the same, I would have found it more constructive if all contributions had considered the function of the individual tales within the work as a whole, thus offering a perspective of the novelle in their intended or broader context. The Introduction by David Lummus considers the function of Day vi in the architecture of the Decameron, aptly highlighting its reflections on the art of storytelling through the power of the word, drawing parallels with Cicero, Scripture, and Boccaccio's own Genealogia deorum gentilium. The introduction has a welcome focus on the framing narrative, specifically the thematic consequences of the 'plebian distraction' (p. 11) and the originality of the conclusion, which establishes the 'valle delle donne' (vi, concl. 18) as a theatre for 'the aestheticization of the erotic' (p. 14). Teresa Kennedy is tasked with vi. 1, in which she persuasively looks past the superficial humour of Madonna Oretta's witty retort, revealing a darker interpretation consisting in the avoidance of sexual violence through metaphorical language and [End Page 254] wit. This is supported by the intertextual allusions created by the attribution of the tale to Filomena, as this evokes her homonymous counterparts in the Filostrato and Ovid's Metamorphoses, as well as earlier tensions with the Decameron's Filostrato. Tale vi. 2 is explored by Giulia Cardillo, who engages with the Genealogia to draw links between the preceding tale and the theme of Day vi. Cardillo convincingly emphasizes the importance of Pampinea's preamble as a didactic tool with which to instruct the discerning reader to lift the 'poetic veil' (p. 40) and reveal a deeper interpretation of the analogy made between wine and words, made all the more valuable by 'the poet's obscuritas' (p. 44). Guyda Armstrong, in her analysis of vi. 3, fills a critical gap in scholarly discourse surrounding this tale by proposing an 'explicitly feminist' (p. 57) reading. Armstrong begins by situating the tale and narrator within the context of the day's theme. She thus draws attention to its status as a continuation of the discourse on language initiated by Pampinea on Day i, as well as the gendered tensions within the brigata, specifically between Dioneo and Elissa. Armstrong gives equal attention to the narrative realism evoked in the tale, for which she outlines a complex web of connections to fourteenth-century Florentine society, staging 'the routine male invasion of [Nonna de' Pulci's] personal space' (p. 67). Broader thematic considerations give way to an essential commentary, offering a 'historicized close-reading' (p. 90) of the socio-political frictions that have often been overlooked. James C. Kriesel's chapter on vi. 4 presents an intertextual analysis of the significance of the crane intertwined with considerations surrounding the tale's 'vernacularity' (p. 96). On this latter point, it would have been beneficial to consider, for example, how Brunetta and Chichibio relate to other plebeian interactions (e.g. Licisca and Tindaro). Kriesel goes on to explore how the protagonists enact a discourse on truth, highlighting biblical resonances, followed by an analysis of Boccaccio's linguistic congruence potentially inspired by Dante. Tale vi. 5 is covered by Zygmunt G. Barański...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Modern Language ReviewSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207