MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362720014 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2023.0050

The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective ed. by David Lummus

2023· article· en· W4362720014 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)ParallelsRhetorical questionStorytellingHistoryLiteratureArtNarrativeVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective ed. by David Lummus Emily Di Dodo The 'Decameron' Sixth Day in Perspective. Ed. by David Lummus. (Lectura Boccaccii, 6) Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2021. xii+290 pp. $75. ISBN 978–1–4875–0871–5. The Sixth Day of the Decameron, over which Elissa reigns, is widely regarded as a tour de force of rhetorical concision, the theme being 'those who, on being provoked by some verbal pleasantry, have returned like for like, or who, by a prompt retort or shrewd manœuvre, have avoided danger, discomfiture or ridicule' (Giovanni Boccaccio, The Decameron, trans. by G. H. McWilliam (New York: Penguin, 2003), p. 444). This volume offers a fresh perspective on and rich insights into these tales, engaging with past criticism, especially concerning the metaliterary nature of the tales, but then builds upon it with novel readings, which in some cases unabashedly move against the grain of traditional scholarship. The book will become a point of reference especially for students, both undergraduate and graduate. All the same, I would have found it more constructive if all contributions had considered the function of the individual tales within the work as a whole, thus offering a perspective of the novelle in their intended or broader context. The Introduction by David Lummus considers the function of Day vi in the architecture of the Decameron, aptly highlighting its reflections on the art of storytelling through the power of the word, drawing parallels with Cicero, Scripture, and Boccaccio's own Genealogia deorum gentilium. The introduction has a welcome focus on the framing narrative, specifically the thematic consequences of the 'plebian distraction' (p. 11) and the originality of the conclusion, which establishes the 'valle delle donne' (vi, concl. 18) as a theatre for 'the aestheticization of the erotic' (p. 14). Teresa Kennedy is tasked with vi. 1, in which she persuasively looks past the superficial humour of Madonna Oretta's witty retort, revealing a darker interpretation consisting in the avoidance of sexual violence through metaphorical language and [End Page 254] wit. This is supported by the intertextual allusions created by the attribution of the tale to Filomena, as this evokes her homonymous counterparts in the Filostrato and Ovid's Metamorphoses, as well as earlier tensions with the Decameron's Filostrato. Tale vi. 2 is explored by Giulia Cardillo, who engages with the Genealogia to draw links between the preceding tale and the theme of Day vi. Cardillo convincingly emphasizes the importance of Pampinea's preamble as a didactic tool with which to instruct the discerning reader to lift the 'poetic veil' (p. 40) and reveal a deeper interpretation of the analogy made between wine and words, made all the more valuable by 'the poet's obscuritas' (p. 44). Guyda Armstrong, in her analysis of vi. 3, fills a critical gap in scholarly discourse surrounding this tale by proposing an 'explicitly feminist' (p. 57) reading. Armstrong begins by situating the tale and narrator within the context of the day's theme. She thus draws attention to its status as a continuation of the discourse on language initiated by Pampinea on Day i, as well as the gendered tensions within the brigata, specifically between Dioneo and Elissa. Armstrong gives equal attention to the narrative realism evoked in the tale, for which she outlines a complex web of connections to fourteenth-century Florentine society, staging 'the routine male invasion of [Nonna de' Pulci's] personal space' (p. 67). Broader thematic considerations give way to an essential commentary, offering a 'historicized close-reading' (p. 90) of the socio-political frictions that have often been overlooked. James C. Kriesel's chapter on vi. 4 presents an intertextual analysis of the significance of the crane intertwined with considerations surrounding the tale's 'vernacularity' (p. 96). On this latter point, it would have been beneficial to consider, for example, how Brunetta and Chichibio relate to other plebeian interactions (e.g. Licisca and Tindaro). Kriesel goes on to explore how the protagonists enact a discourse on truth, highlighting biblical resonances, followed by an analysis of Boccaccio's linguistic congruence potentially inspired by Dante. Tale vi. 5 is covered by Zygmunt G. Barański...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,403
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,934

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle