MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362725537 · doi:10.33140/jmtcm.02.02.03

The Seven Millenium Problems & AT Math

2023· article· en· W4362725537 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T E Cusack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjectureNumber theoryFoundation (evidence)MathematicsPrincipal (computer security)Goldbach's conjectureMathematics educationPareto principleCalculus (dental)Computer sciencePure mathematicsHistoryMathematical optimizationArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we attempt to provide the solution for all 7 Millenium Problems put out by the Clay Mathematics Institute. In addition, we provide the solution to the Beal Conjecture, the Goldbach’s Conjecture, and the underlying Pareto Principal foundation. The AT Math solution has been available in modern times since January 2016. It was known to ancient civilizations that this author has written about

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational MathematicsSame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207