MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362731267 · doi:10.1142/9789811267390_0001

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) in cancer proliferation: Molecular interactions and possible therapeutic targets

2023· book-chapter· en· W4362731267 on OpenAlexaff
Shokooh Salimimoghadam, Mahshid Deldar Abad Paskeh, Sepideh Mirzaei, Mehrdad Hashemi, Azuma Kalu, Noushin Nabavi

Bibliographic record

VenueWORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNACancerComputational biologyBiologyCancer researchGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer is one of the most life-threatening diseases worldwide and is characterized by uncontrolled cell division, suppressed cell death, promoted metastasis, and angiogenesis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded RNA molecules at ∼22 nucleotides in length belonging to the family of small non-coding RNAs. They exert critical regulatory roles in cells and shape various cellular activities. Tumor suppressor miRNAs work in a way to suppress oncogenic pathways, while tumor-promoting miRNAs mediate genes responsible for oncogenesis and suppress tumor inhibitory genes. However, there are miRNAs with dual roles in suppressing or promoting tumor growth in different cancer types. miRNAs regulate gene expression and protein function in cells by targeting mainly the 3′ untranslated region of a gene. Studies on the role of miRNAs in cancer illuminate the complex interaction between miRNAs and pathways involved in cancer. This chapter reviews the current knowledge regarding the importance and role of miRNAs in cancer focusing on proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and cell cycle arrest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooksSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207