Attention-based CT scan interpolation for lesion segmentation of colorectal liver metastases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small liver lesions common to colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) are challenging for convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation models, especially when we have a wide range of slice thicknesses in the computed tomography (CT) scans. Slice thickness of CT images may vary by clinical indication. For example, thinner slices are used for presurgical planning when fine anatomic details of small vessels are required. While keeping the effective radiation dose in patients as low as possible, various slice thicknesses are employed in CRLMs due to their limitations. However, differences in slice thickness across CTs lead to significant performance degradation in CT segmentation models based on CNNs. This paper proposes a novel unsupervised attention-based interpolation model to generate intermediate slices from consecutive triplet slices in CT scans. We integrate segmentation loss during the interpolation model's training to leverage segmentation labels in existing slices to generate middle ones. Unlike common interpolation techniques in CT volumes, our model highlights the regions of interest (liver and lesions) inside the abdominal CT scans in the interpolated slice. Moreover, our model's outputs are consistent with the original input slices while increasing the segmentation performance in two cutting-edge 3D segmentation pipelines. We tested the proposed model on the CRLM dataset to upsample subjects with thick slices and create isotropic volume for our segmentation model. The produced isotropic dataset increases the Dice score in the segmentation of lesions and outperforms other interpolation approaches in terms of interpolation metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".