MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4363674597 · doi:10.1101/2023.04.06.535924

Layer Dependence of Monocular and Binocular Responses in Human Ocular Dominance Columns at 7T using VASO and BOLD

2023· preprint· en· W4363674597 on OpenAlexafffund
Atena Akbari, Joseph S. Gati, Peter Zeman, Brett Liem, Ravi S. Menon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada First Research Excellence FundFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsOcular dominance columnOcular dominanceVisual cortexMonocularNeuroscienceInhibitory postsynaptic potentialMonocular deprivationStriate cortexAnatomyChemistryCortex (anatomy)Laminar flowVenuleReceptive fieldPsychologyPhysicsOpticsBiologyMicrocirculationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The neurons located in the striate cortex (V1) preferentially respond to the input from one eye or another, forming a fingerprint-like pattern of ocular dominance columns (ODCs). At this mesoscopic scale, accessible by ultra-high field fMRI, V1 is supplied/drained by a network of surface (pial) vessels that connect to descending/ascending tangential vessels that penetrate the cortex and supply/drain a capillary bed whose density is also layer dependent. In this study, we measured the layer dependence of monocular and binocular responses of ocular dominance columns in V1 at 7T using Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) and VAscular Space Occupancy (VASO) contrasts. Our results indicate that the microvascular blood volume changes that give rise to VASO are well confined to the site of neural activity across the layers of the cortex and between the columns. Pial veins dominate the BOLD response and mix the signal between columns. When the GRE BOLD response was examined in only the VASO specific voxels (thus eliminating the pial vein signal), the laminar profile was very similar to VASO, however, the columnar response was still blurred. Caution needs to be exercised in the interpretation of signal changes in BOLD at the mesoscale both in terms of feedforward/feedback effects and inhibitory and excitatory effects. Highlights - VASO produced laminar profiles that were consistent with the known layer-dependent neuronal response to monocular and binocular stimulations. - VASO better differentiated the response between columns belonging to the left and right eyes. - GRE BOLD signal spatial specificity was poor in both laminar and columnar directions, however, when the pial veins were suppressed, the laminar BOLD signal was very similar to the VASO signal. - Caution needs to be exercised when interpreting cognitive neuroscience BOLD studies at the mesoscale level due to the confounding effects of pial and sub-pial veins and venules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVisual perception and processing mechanismsFrench-language works237,207