Privacy and Accuracy for Cloud-Fog-Edge Collaborative Driver-Vehicle-Road Relation Graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are three key roles in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): driver, vehicle and road. However, existing static interactions among Driver-Vehicle-Road (DVR) are too passive to reflect the change of driver preferences, vehicle conditions, road conditions, etc. Therefore, we provide a data-driven Cloud-Fog-Edge Collaborative Driver-Vehicle-Road (CFEC-DVR) framework. The framework could self-adaptively evolves through continuous iteration to provide better ITS services for humans. The collaboration among DVR creates a lot of relation data that construct our relation graphs. Cloud brings some privacy risks. Relation graphs have great analytic value. As DVR collaboration, privacy quality and analytic accuracy are three key issues in the framework, we propose a Relation Graph Privacy-Preserving scheme with High Accuracy in our framework, which is named as RGPP-HA. Based on machine learning, our method nearly maximizes the difficulty for attackers to know exactly how many other roles are connected to the attacked role, which enhances the privacy quality. Meanwhile, we find as much valuable information as possible from roles’ encrypted relations for more accurately analytic performance. Based on the experiments, we compare the proposed scheme RGPP-HA with existing classic and relevant schemes. The experimental results show that our scheme has the best privacy quality and analytic accuracy. This further verifies the feasibility of CFEC-DVR framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".