Psychological Well Being and The Tendency of Quarter Life Crisis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis is a phenomenon of emotional crisis due to individual unpreparedness in emerging adulthood. This crisis is one of the challenges in the lives of college students who are experiencing a transitional stage from adolescence to adulthood with emotional characteristics such as frustration, panic, worry, and difficulty making decisions regarding the future. This study aims to determine the effect of psychological well being on the tendency of quarter life crisis in college students. This research method uses quantitative methods with simple linear regression analysis. Sampling in this study used a probability sampling technique with a simple random sampling method. The subjects in this study were active students at universities in the city of Banjarmasin. Based on the analysis carried out, it was obtained a significance value of p = 0.000 (p <0.05) which indicates that there is a significant effect of psychological well being (X) on the quarter life crisis (Y). Psychological well being in this study provides an effective contribution of 64.9% to the quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it