MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364322321 · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3265866

Joint Optimization of Platoon Control and Resource Scheduling in Cooperative Vehicle-Infrastructure System

2023· article· en· W4364322321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPlatoonScheduling (production processes)Cell Transmission ModelComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Mathematical optimizationEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsTraffic congestion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle platooning technology is essential in achieving group consensus, on-road safety, and fuel-saving. Meanwhile, Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication significantly facilitates the development of connected vehicles. However, the coupled effects of the longitudinal vehicle's mobility, platoon control and V2I communication may result in a low reliable communication network between the platoon vehicle and the roadside unit, there is a tradeoff between the platoon control and communication reliability. In this article, we investigate a bi-objective joint optimization problem where the first objective is to maximize the success probability of data transmission (communication reliability) and the second objective function is to minimize the traffic oscillation flow. The vehicle's mobility state of the platoon vehicle affects the channel capacity and transmission performance. In this context, we deeply explore the relationship between control signals and resource scheduling and theoretically deduce a closed-form expression of the optimal communication reliability objective. Through this closed expression, we transform the bi-objective model into a single objective MPC model by using <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\epsilon$</tex-math></inline-formula> -constraint method. We design an efficient algorithm for solving the joint optimization model and prove the convergence. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, we finally evaluate the spacing error, speed error, and resource scheduling of platooning vehicles through simulation experiments in two experimental scenarios. The results show that the proposed control-communication co-design can improve the platoon control performance while satisfying the high reliability of V2I communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it