MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364322545 · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3266183

Visual Relationship Detection for Workplace Safety Applications

2023· article· en· W4364322545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimodal Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBayesian networkContext (archaeology)Object detectionVisualizationArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Graphical user interfaceMachine learningData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Programming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applications of object and visual relationship detection for safety and security applications are in its infancy. The state-of-the-art computer vision research is largely focused on improving mean average precision and mean average recall performance on standard, general datasets, such as the verbs in common objects in context and the visual genome dataset and rarely mention the potential of such models in safety and security scenarios. We propose to train and develop an object and visual relationship detection neural network to be used as part of the backend model for a decision support system. We use a naive Bayesian network to determine scenarios where our proposed object and visual relationship detection network is error prone. We also release a graphical user interface, which demonstrates how our backend neural network and naive Bayesian network can be used for hazardous workplace safety and security applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it