A transfer learning approach for automatic mapping of retrogressive thaw slumps (RTSs) in the western Canadian Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retrogressive thaw slumps (RTSs) are thermokarst landforms that develop on slopes in permafrost regions when thawing permafrost causes the land surface to collapse. RTSs are an indicator of climate change and pose a threat to human infrastructure and ecosystems in the affected areas. As the availability of ready-to-use high-resolution satellite imagery increases, automatic RTS mapping is being explored with deep learning methods. We employed a pre-trained Mask-RCNN model to automatically map RTSs on Banks Island and Victoria Island in the western Canadian Arctic, where there is extensive RTS activity. We tested the model with different settings, including image band combinations, backbones, and backbone trainable layers, and performed hyper-parameter tuning and determined the optimal learning rate, momentum, and decay rate for each of the model settings. Our final model successfully mapped most of the RTSs in our test sites, with F1 scores ranging from 0.61 to 0.79. Our study demonstrates that transfer learning from a pre-trained Mask-RCNN model is an effective deep learning model that has the potential to be applied for RTS mapping across the Canadian Arctic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".