The inaugural 2022 HRX meeting: A patient-centered digital health meeting for the acceleration of cardiovascular innovation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inaugural 2022 HRX meeting (HRX22) was sponsored by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). In 2019, in alignment with HRS’s strategic plan to innovate to improve patient care and expand digital health and after launching the Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal, HRS planned to annually convene all stakeholders to accelerate cardiovascular innovation. The HRX22 meeting focused on innovation in digital health. Unlike other digital health summits, HRX22 brought together the entire spectrum of stakeholders, including cardiovascular clinicians; engineers; product developers; entrepreneurs; investors; hospital administrators; medical technology, commercial technology, and pharmaceutical companies; regulators; nonprofit organizations; and patient advocacy groups to develop patient-centered digital solutions to many of the challenges of the current healthcare environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.091 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".