MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365142286 · doi:10.3920/cep234013

Comment on ‘The immediate effect of water treadmill walking exercise on overground in-hand walking locomotion in the horse’

2023· article· en· W4365142286 on OpenAlexaff
Renaud Léguillette, Persephone McCrae, Warwick M. Bayly

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Exercise Physiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreadmillPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyExercise physiologyMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the editor We were pleased to see that the latest edition of the Comparative Exercise Physiology (2022; 18(5)) included a study on the topic of water treadmill exercise in horses. The literature in this field is scarce and there is a need to provide more scientific evidence on the use and protocols of water treadmill exercise in horses. We were however disappointed when we read the article entitled ‘The immediate effect of water treadmill walking exercise on overground in-hand walking locomotion in the horse’ by Tranquille et al . published in Comparative Exercise Physiology (2022; 18: 413-418) and wanted to bring some points to the attention of the readers and the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative Exercise PhysiologySame topicVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchFrench-language works237,207