MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365149257 · doi:10.1515/iupac.94.0213

Henry’S Law Constants

2023· dataset· en· W4365149257 on OpenAlexaff
Rolf Sander, William E. Acree, Alex De Visscher, Stephen E. Schwartz, Timothy J. Wallington

Bibliographic record

VenueIUPAC Standards Online · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHenry's lawThermodynamicsReciprocalDilutionLawConstant (computer programming)Proportionality (law)Volatility (finance)Limit (mathematics)Statistical physicsMathematical economicsSolubilityMathematicsChemistryPhysicsPhilosophyMathematical analysisEconometricsPhysical chemistryComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Henry’s law states that the abundance of a volatile solute dissolved in a liquid is proportional to its abundance in the gas phase. It applies at equilibrium and in the limit of infinite dilution of the solute. For historical reasons, numerous different definitions, names, and symbols are used in the literature to express the proportionality coefficient, denoted the “Henry’s law constant”. Here, a consistent set of recommendations is presented. An important distinction is made between two new recommended reciprocal quantities: “Henry’s law solubility constant” (Hs) and “Henry’s law volatility constant” (Hv). Eight recommended variants of Hs and Hv are described and relations among them presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUPAC Standards OnlineSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207