MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365151460 · doi:10.4271/2023-01-0555

Freevalve: A Comparative GWP Life Cycle Assessment of E-fuel Fully Variable Valvetrain-equipped Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicles

2023· article· en· W4365151460 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelrahman W. M. Elmagdoub, Joris Simaitis, Mattias Halmearo, Urban Carlson, James Turner, Chris Brace, Sam Akehurst

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringInternal combustion engineRenewable energyPowertrainCamshaftWork (physics)Battery electric vehicleFuel efficiencyBattery (electricity)Efficient energy useCombustionEngineeringComputer scienceTorqueMechanical engineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Throughout its history, the internal combustion engine has been continuously scrutinized to achieve strict legislative emission targets. With the dawn of renewable fuels fast approaching, most Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) equipped hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) face difficulty in adjusting their precise control strategies to new fuels. This is partly due to constrained limitations associated with camshaft-induced design-point air induction limitations. Freevalve is a fully variable valvetrain technology enabling independent control of valve lifts, durations, and timings. Additionally, the added degrees-of-freedom enable the capability to shut-off individual engine valves, optimizing combustion performance and stability through specific speed ranges. By design, it minimizes the existing breathing-related constraints that are currently hindering the extraction of the higher efficiency potential of ICEs. To explore the potential environmental benefits from improved fuel consumption and emissions, this study conducts a comparative global warming potential life cycle assessment on a HEV-configured Freevalve ICE vehicle against battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and camshaft-induced HEVs. Throughout this work, particular consideration is given to the lifecycle impact of Freevalve technology to reason its performance and efficiency gains in new generation powertrains. This is accomplished through a separate LCA study based on system bill of materials and estimated production energy usage. Additionally, the work evaluates current global average energy mixes and futuristic energy scenarios based on European projections to assess the impact of renewable energy and alternative methods of direct air capture (DAC) e-fuel production on total global warming potential (GWP) lifecycle impact. Under the fully renewable energy and fuel production scenarios, for a lifetime of 150,000 km, results suggested that e-fuel Freevalve HEVs have a net cycle GWP impact 55% lower than BEVs. Similar conclusions are observed for the global average grid case where a 50% reduction is observed in favour of the e-fuel Freevalve HEV compared to the BEV. This led to suggest that Freevalve-equipped engines coupled with next generation renewable fuels and dedicated hybrid concepts have significant potential in addressing environmental concerns and achieving global net zero CO<sub>2</sub> emission targets.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207