La coopération des pays tiers et la gestion des migrations dans l’espace euroméditerranéen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objet de cet article est d’explorer le processus de gestion de la politique européenne de migration, ainsi que les formes sous lesquelles il se décline dans le cadre des relations euroméditerranéennes. L’article soutient l’idée selon laquelle l’implication des pays du sud de la Méditerranée est intimement liée à la construction de la dimension externe de la politique européenne de migration. Or, cette dimension externe n’est pas exempte d’ambiguïtés, ce qui explique à bien des égards le fait que la coopération avec ces pays s’est diluée dans un processus global de sécurisation des frontières de l’Union européenne. L’article se penche ensuite sur les limites de cette gestion afin de démontrer que la coopération avec les pays du sud de la Méditerranée n’a pas su s’affranchir des incertitudes de la gouvernance externe de la politique migratoire de l’Union européenne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".