Les services jeunesse des bibliothèques publiques québécoises : une prestation à plusieurs mains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre novembre 2021 et mars 2022 se tenait l’Enquête sur les services jeunesse dans les bibliothèques publiques du Québec, qui avait pour objectif inédit de brosser le portrait des services jeunesse offerts dans les bibliothèques publiques de la province, en cherchant plus précisément, d’une part, à définir les publics jeunesse eux-mêmes ainsi que les services qui leur sont proposés et, d’autre part, la formation, les caractéristiques, les compétences et les responsabilités des prestataires de ces services. Cet article, dans la même optique que la communication de ses auteures au récent Congrès des professionnel.le.s de l’information 2022, présente plus particulièrement les résultats de cette enquête qui portent sur la collaboration dans les services jeunesse des bibliothèques publiques québécoises, notamment en matière de types de partenaires, de retombées des collaborations, de programmes jeunesse, incluant la littératie familiale et les programmes hors les murs, d’implication sociocommunautaire et d’environnements collaboratifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".