MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365443624 · doi:10.1186/s13722-023-00371-4

Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of INEBRIA

2023· article· en· W4365443624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAddiction Science & Clinical Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNYU Grossman School of MedicineYork UniversityKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthStony Brook UniversityKaiser PermanenteMassachusetts General Hospital
KeywordsHealth psychologyPublic healthPsychologyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite the large and increasing burden of hazardous drinking and tobacco use in India, access to appropriate interventions remains limited because of human resource shortages.The aim of AMBIT and ToQuit was to develop contextually appropriate text-messaging brief interventions (BIs) for hazardous drinking and tobacco use respectively using a systematic and evidence based intervention development process.Methods: The intervention development process included (a) examination and synthesis of global evidence on effectiveness of text messaging interventions for the target conditions; (b) in-depth qualitative interviews with a range of stakeholders such as hazardous drinkers, tobacco users, and health professionals; (c) Delphi surveys to refine intervention content; (d) intervention development workshops; (e)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it