Single nucleotide variants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations from sputum correlate with baseline lung function and predict disease progression in individuals with cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The severity and progression of lung disease are highly variable across individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) and are imperfectly predicted by mutations in the human gene CFTR, lung microbiome variation or other clinical factors. The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( Pa ) dominates airway infections in most CF adults. Here we hypothesized that within–host genetic variation of Pa populations would be associated with lung disease severity. To quantify Pa genetic variation within CF sputum samples, we used deep amplicon sequencing (AmpliSeq) of 209 Pa genes previously associated with pathogenesis or adaptation to the CF lung. We trained machine learning models using Pa single nucleotide variants (SNVs), microbiome diversity data and clinical factors to classify lung disease severity at the time of sputum sampling, and to predict lung function decline after 5 years in a cohort of 54 adult CF patients with chronic Pa infection. Models using Pa SNVs alone classified lung disease severity with good sensitivity and specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: AUROC=0.87). Models were less predictive of lung function decline after 5 years (AUROC=0.74) but still significantly better than random. The addition of clinical data, but not sputum microbiome diversity data, yielded only modest improvements in classifying baseline lung function (AUROC=0.92) and predicting lung function decline (AUROC=0.79), suggesting that Pa AmpliSeq data account for most of the predictive value. Our work provides a proof of principle that Pa genetic variation in sputum tracks lung disease severity, moderately predicts lung function decline and could serve as a disease biomarker among CF patients with chronic Pa infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".