MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365452257 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106664

Neuronal SNAP-23 is critical for synaptic plasticity and spatial memory independently of NMDA receptor regulation

2023· article· en· W4365452257 on OpenAlexafffund
Mengjia Huang, Na‐Ryum Bin, Jayant Rai, Ke Ma, Chun Hin Chow, Sarah Eide, Hidekiyo Harada, Jianbing Xiao, Daorong Feng, Hong‐Shuo Sun, Zhong‐Ping Feng, Herbert Y. Gaisano, Jeffrey E. Pessin, Philippe P. Monnier, Kenichi Okamoto, Liang Zhang, Shuzo Sugita

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemToronto General HospitalLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Science and Technology of Jilin ProvinceNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesPeople's Government of Jilin Province
KeywordsNeuroscienceLong-term potentiationSynaptic plasticityAMPA receptorNeurotransmissionMetaplasticityNMDA receptorBiologyPostsynaptic potentialGlutamate receptorNeuronal memory allocationSynaptic fatigueChemistryInhibitory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory postsynaptic potentialReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SNARE-mediated membrane fusion plays a crucial role in presynaptic vesicle exocytosis and also in postsynaptic receptor delivery. The latter is considered particularly important for synaptic plasticity and learning and memory, yet the identity of the key SNARE proteins remains elusive. Here, we investigate the role of neuronal synaptosomal-associated protein-23 (SNAP-23) by analyzing pyramidal-neuron specific SNAP-23 conditional knockout (cKO) mice. Electrophysiological analysis of SNAP-23 deficient neurons using acute hippocampal slices showed normal basal neurotransmission in CA3-CA1 synapses with unchanged AMPA and NMDA currents. Nevertheless, we found theta-burst stimulation-induced long-term potentiation (LTP) was vastly diminished in SNAP-23 cKO slices. Moreover, unlike syntaxin-4 cKO mice where both basal neurotransmission and LTP decrease manifested changes in a broad set of behavioral tasks, deficits of SNAP-23 cKO are more limited to spatial memory. Our data reveal that neuronal SNAP-23 is selectively crucial for synaptic plasticity and spatial memory without affecting basal glutamate receptor function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207