Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa, Harga, Emosional Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Wyndham Hotel Palembang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) Untuk melihat pengaruh antara kualitas pelayanan jasa, harga, dan emosional terhadap kepuasan pelanggan pada Wyndham Opi Hotel di Palembang secara Parsial. (2) Untuk melihat pengaruh antara kualitas pelayanan jasa, harga, dan emosional terhadap kepuasan pelanggan pada Wyndham Opi Hotel di Palembang secara Simultan. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan yaitu penyebaran kuisioner dengan skala interval, dengan jumlah 365 responden. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode purposive sampling dan dengan bantuan software SPSS 22. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa uji parsial (uji-t) variabel Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa (X1), Harga (X2), berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan,dan Emosional (X3) berpengaruh negative terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan. Berdasarkan (uji-F) menunjukkan hasil bahwa variabel independen yang terdiri dari variabel Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa (X1), Harga (X2), dan Emosional (X3) berpengaruh terhadap variabel dependen dalam penelitian ini yaitu Kepuasan Pelanggan (Y) secara simultan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it