MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365458594 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00804

Preparative Electrophoresis for HDL Particle Size Separation and Intact-Mass Apolipoprotein Proteoform Analysis

2023· article· en· W4365458594 on OpenAlexaff
Cameron Lloyd-Jones, Henrique S. Seckler, Nicholas DiStefano, Allan D. Sniderman, Philip D. Compton, Neil L. Kelleher, John T. Wilkins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health CentreRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
FundersKaiser Foundation Research InstituteNorthwestern UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaNational Institute of General Medical SciencesAmerican Heart AssociationFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryApolipoprotein BChromatographyApolipoprotein A1Gel electrophoresisMass spectrometryCholesterolBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most abundant proteins on high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), apolipoproteins A-I (APOA1) and A-II (APOA2), are determinants of HDL function with 15 and 9 proteoforms (chemical-structure variants), respectively. The relative abundance of these proteoforms in human serum is associated with HDL cholesterol efflux capacity, and cholesterol content. However, the association between proteoform concentrations and HDL size is unknown. We employed a novel native-gel electrophoresis technique, clear native gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (CN-GELFrEE) paired with mass spectrometry of intact proteins to investigate this association. Pooled serum was fractionated using acrylamide gels of lengths 8 and 25 cm. Western blotting determined molecular diameter and intact-mass spectrometry determined proteoform profiles of each fraction. The 8- and 25 cm experiments generated 19 and 36 differently sized HDL fractions, respectively. The proteoform distribution varied across size. Fatty-acylated APOA1 proteoforms were associated with larger HDL sizes (Pearson’s R = 0.94, p = 4 × 10 –7 ) and were approximately four times more abundant in particles larger than 9.6 nm than in total serum; HDL-unbound APOA1 was acylation-free and contained the pro-peptide proAPOA1. APOA2 proteoform abundance was similar across HDL sizes. Our results establish CN-GELFrEE as an effective lipid–particle separation technique and suggest that acylated proteoforms of APOA1 are associated with larger HDL particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207