MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365460614 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.05514

State estimation of a carbon capture process through POD model reduction and neural network approximation

2023· preprint· en· W4365460614 on OpenAlexaff
Siyu Liu, Xunyuan Yin, Jinfeng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint of deliveryExtended Kalman filterArtificial neural networkPerceptronMultilayer perceptronModel order reductionComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryKalman filterReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an efficient approach for state estimation of post-combustion CO2 capture plants (PCCPs) by using reduced-order neural network models. The method involves extracting lower-dimensional feature vectors from high-dimensional operational data of the PCCP and constructing a reduced-order process model using proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural networks capture the dominant dynamics of the process and train the network parameters with low-dimensional data obtained from open-loop simulations. The proposed POD-MLP model can be used as the basis for estimating the states of PCCPs at a significantly decreased computational cost. For state estimation, a reduced-order extended Kalman filtering (EKF) scheme based on the POD-MLP model is developed. Our simulations demonstrate that the proposed POD-MLP modeling approach reduces computational complexity compared to the POD-only model for nonlinear systems. Additionally, the POD-MLP-EKF algorithm can accurately reconstruct the full state information of PCCPs while significantly improving computational efficiency compared to the EKF based on the original PCCP model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207