Fast <i>D</i> <sub>M,M</sub> calculation in LDR brachytherapy using deep learning methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. The Monte Carlo (MC) method provides a complete solution to the tissue heterogeneity effects in low-energy low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. However, long computation times limit the clinical implementation of MC-based treatment planning solutions. This work aims to apply deep learning (DL) methods, specifically a model trained with MC simulations, to predict accurate dose to medium in medium ( D M,M ) distributions in LDR prostate brachytherapy. Approach. To train the DL model, 2369 single-seed configurations, corresponding to 44 prostate patient plans, were used. These patients underwent LDR brachytherapy treatments in which 125 I SelectSeed sources were implanted. For each seed configuration, the patient geometry, the MC dose volume and the single-seed plan volume were used to train a 3D Unet convolutional neural network. Previous knowledge was included in the network as an r 2 kernel related to the first-order dose dependency in brachytherapy. MC and DL dose distributions were compared through the dose maps, isodose lines, and dose-volume histograms. Features enclosed in the model were visualized. Main results. Model features started from the symmetrical kernel and finalized with an anisotropic representation that considered the patient organs and their interfaces, the source position, and the low- and high-dose regions. For a full prostate patient, small differences were seen below the 20% isodose line. When comparing DL-based and MC-based calculations, the predicted CTV D 90 metric had an average difference of −0.1%. Average differences for OARs were −1.3%, 0.07%, and 4.9% for the rectum D 2cc , the bladder D 2cc , and the urethra D 0.1cc . The model took 1.8 ms to predict a complete 3D D M,M volume (1.18 M voxels). Significance. The proposed DL model stands for a simple and fast engine which includes prior physics knowledge of the problem. Such an engine considers the anisotropy of a brachytherapy source and the patient tissue composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".